Sears Holdings Is So Broke It May Not Be Able To Exit Ch.11 Bankruptcy

WYCO Researcher
8.44K Followers

Summary

  • Confirmation hearing has been rescheduled to September 27 instead of September 18.
  • Now vendors are being ask to take a huge discount on their claims that many were expecting full payment.
  • ESL/Lampert did not even bother to vote on the reorganization plan.
  • PBGC voted to accept the plan, so it is still possible for the court to confirm the plan.
  • The APA dispute still is not settled.

Sears Holdings (OTCPK:SHLDQ) may not have enough cash needed to pay certain administrative claims in order to exit Ch.11 bankruptcy. In a court filing (docket 5144 Exhibit B) late Friday, Sears stated they are now trying to get holders of administrative claims, which are mostly vendor claims, to take a huge "haircut" for their claims. These must be paid in order to exit Ch.11 or Sears Holdings may have to convert to Ch.7 with a trustee controlling the liquidation process. Many vendors have already sold their claims to bankruptcy claim speculators who are worried how much they will actually get paid.

The confusion over the numbers was clearly evident at a seven hour hearing on September 12, when Judge Drain gave up on determining the amount Sears Holdings and Transform (ESL/Lampert) owe each other regarding their dispute over the Asset Purchase Agreement. I expect even more confusion at the September 27 (updated date) confirmation hearing in White Plains. (The hearing may take more than just one day.) At least the lawyers are making a fortune off this deal, but most investors, however, could get nothing.

Plan Voting Results

Prime Clerk filed the voting results (docket 5137) and as expected, PBGC voted to accept the plan since they negotiated their own special deal months ago. They were in their own separate class-number 3. Shareholders were not allowed to vote on the plan and were deemed to have rejected it. ESL/Lampert did not even vote. (The polite way is to say they "abstained" from voting.) Because they filed objections to the plan, lawyers decided to consider their potential votes as rejecting the plan.

Since at least one impaired voting class accepted (Class 3) the plan, the plan is confirmable under sections 1129(a)(10) and sections 1029(b) as long as the plan does not "discriminate unfairly" and

This article was written by

8.44K Followers
I no longer write for Seeking Alpha. B.A. in Economics; M.S. in Finance. I usually wrote about distressed companies and companies in Ch.11 bankruptcy. I am now fully retired after spending decades in investments.

Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

More on SHLDQ