Lumber Liquidators: Making Sense Of Insider Antics

Patrick Mayles
168 Followers

Summary

  • Founder Tom Sullivan’s ham-fisted activism sent share price up 40% before tumbling back to pre-hype levels.
  • The possible pump-and-dump saw Sullivan increase his holdings in the company from 6% to nearly 8%, and quickly reduce to 1.55% after the stock price rose.
  • Questionable motives notwithstanding, Sullivan raised some valid criticisms regarding company costs and management, receiving support from a prominent shareholder group.
  • Lumber Liquidators is better off without Sullivan, but should heed his warnings regarding administrative bloat and endless expansion.

What a month! September was a wild ride for Lumber Liquidators (LL). What was perhaps a generic pump-and-dump by founder and former CEO, Tom Sullivan, was a windfall for savvy volatility traders. Serious stakeholders were left scratching their heads as to what exactly had occurred, and how the underlying value of the company changed.

This article seeks to get the reader up to speed on what transpired in September, what the shake-up means for the company, and why Lumber Liquidators is better off without Tom Sullivan. We will also discuss a few of Sullivan's valid critiques of the company, and how it should move forward.

What Happened

In late August, Tom Sullivan's F9 Investments increased its holdings in Lumber Liquidators by 30%, and expressed an interest in a bid to take the company private, potentially including a merger with his private company Cabinets To Go. Wall Street, clearly no fan of the firm's current situation, reacted with glee, sending shares soaring about 30% on the news.

The Lumber Liquidators Value Committee (LLVC), holding a similar 6% interest in the company, joined the chorus calling for new management and/or ownership. The group is headed by fellow Seeking Alpha contributor Mario Rizzi. Rizzi has been a vocal critic of Lumber Liquidators' current management in the past, so it comes as little surprise that the Value Committee would join Sullivan in the corporate coups.

As the stock rose on the scuttlebutt of management and ownership changes, Sullivan pulled an abrupt 180, calling the stock too expensive and deciding to offload 80% of his shares. The stock price is now around $10, near where it was before all the hubbub began.

Sullivan's Offloading Leaves Us Better Off

It is difficult to assign a clear motive to Sullivan's actions. The knee-jerk reaction is to call it

This article was written by

168 Followers
Bachelor's in Economics and Accounting from UC Santa Barbara, Graduate Student of Economics. Professional writer, with a passion for studying and discussing financial markets and political topics. I mostly write about low cap and high-growth companies

Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

About LLFLQ Stock

SymbolLast Price% Chg
Market Cap
PE
Yield
Rev Growth (YoY)
Short Interest
Prev. Close
Compare to Peers

More on LLFLQ

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
LLFLQ
--