The End Of All Non-A Malls? Painting With Too Broad A Brush

Jun. 06, 2017 1:18 AM ET, , , , 54 Comments

Summary

  • A ludicrous mentality has taken over the herds in relation to Malls.
  • The belief is that all Non-A malls will perish.
  • "Sales per square foot" is just one measure to value a mall.

Based on prices as of June 2, it is my estimate that Class A mall REITS trade at about a 30% discount to Net Asset Value. The Class B's are selling at an even more extreme 50-70% discounts. The current mentality is that only Class A malls will survive and that too with a lot of difficulty.

What is a Class A Mall?

According to Podell Real Estate Advisors it is the demarcation above. Sounds simple enough. So where do the Big Retail REITS stand?

Source: Taubman Presentation

Taubman's (TCO) recent presentation broke down the sales per SqFt. Seems crystal clear. But remember this is the Sales per SqFt of the underlying tenants. What happens if we look at rent per SqFt? Before you look at the next picture, try to imagine how these same malls would look in terms of Rent per SqFt.

Ready?

Similar. TCO still rules supreme. Yet not identical. One notable standout in the order is Simon Property group (SPG) with sales of $614 a Sq FT, which is 32% above Pennsylvania REIT's (PEI), is struggling to get the same rent per SqFt on its properties. Same for Macerich (MAC) with sales of 36% above PEI. Taubman is getting 10% higher rents than PEI, but it is taking a whopping 72% higher sales to do it.

Now let's look at how the market values the funds from operations of these REITS?

Source: Author's estimates & calculations

I think all of them are cheap, but clearly the market is pricing PEI off the sales per SqFt rather than the rent per SqFt. Can you imagine if the entire industry was promoting this metric (rent per SqFt) how the mall REITS would be valued? One could argue that this higher rent is a burden for its tenants or conversely argue that PEI has

This article was written by

45.99K Followers

Trapping Value is a team of analysts with over 40 years of combined experience generating options income while also focusing on capital preservation. They run the investing group Conservative Income Portfolio in partnership with Preferred Stock Trader. The investing group features two income-generating portfolios and a bond ladder.

Trapping Value provides Covered Calls, and Preferred Stock Trader covers Fixed Income. The Covered Calls Portfolio is designed to provide lower volatility income investing with a focus on capital preservation. The fixed income portfolio focuses on buying securities with high income potential and heavy undervaluation relative to comparatives. Learn more.

Analyst’s Disclosure:I am/we are long PEI, WPG. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

I am short WPG Puts.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
MAC--
The Macerich Company
SPG--
Simon Property Group, Inc.
TCO--
Taubman Centers, Inc.
WPGGQ--
Washington Prime Group Inc.
PRETQ--
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust

Related Analysis