Introduction
There's no shortage of articles that try to convince us about the heavy CO2 footprint of battery electric vehicles. John Petersen just wrote one recently, concluding that the Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) Model 3 has a heavier CO2 footprint than Toyota’s (TM) Camry Hybrid. Although that might be true, I will show in my analysis that it does not matter much. Battery Electric vehicles have not only better driving characteristics and economics, but also a lot more favorable environmental footprints -hence they are destined to win over. And Tesla is leading the way in that segment.
It is true, every BEV comes with a heavy “baggage” - the carbon footprint of its battery production. For instance, it has been calculated that the Model 3 battery comes with a 12.75 metric ton CO2 footprint. However, if we look at the greenhouse gas emissions from passenger vehicles on the EPA site, we find that "a typical passenger vehicle emits about 4.6 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.” A battery baggage of 12.75 metric tons does not seem so insurmountable now. But what about other cars/models in other countries?
In order to understand if BEVs are really helping the environment, I would frame the question a bit differently: How long does it take for an electric vehicle to “recover” the CO2 baggage of its battery production?
As it turns out, there are only four major factors that influence the answer if we want to calculate the mentioned distance:
- What size is the battery’s CO2 emission baggage?
- What's the energy consumption of the BEV per mile?
- In which country/grid is the energy produced and what is its CO2 footprint per kWh?
- What is the fuel economy and CO2 emission of the comparable gasoline car per mile?
Since it would be quite difficult (and convoluted) to